Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2021)
Effect of land configuration methods and sulphur levels on yield attributes, quality and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)
Author(s): PB Gunjal, AB Mohite, JB Patil and VB Gedam
Abstract: The field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2019-20 on medium black soil to study the effect of different land configuration methods and sulphur levels and their interaction at post graduate research farm, R.C.S.M. College of Agriculture, Kolhapur(MS). The treatment was conducted in split plot design with three replication and sixteen treatment comprising of four land configuration methods viz., I1- flat bed, I2- BBF,I3- ridge and furrow (2 feet), I4- ridge and furrow (3 feet) and four sulphur levels viz., S1-00 kg ha-1, S2- 10 kg ha-1,S3 - 20 kg ha-1, S4- 30 kg ha-1 in subplots. The yield and quality attributes like number of pods plant-1, length of podsplant-1, weight of pods plant-1, number of seeds pods-1, weight of seeds plant-1, 100 seeds weight, oil and protein content as well as yield was also found maximum with the land configuration method ridge and furrow (3 feet) however it was comparable with the method BBF. As a result, the land configuration method ridge and furrow (3 feet) had the highest seed and stover yields as well as oil and the protein content were found maximum in the method ridge and furrow (3 feet). The yield and quality attributes were also highest and influenced significantly by application of 30 Kg S ha-1 but on par with 20 Kg S ha-1. As a result the application of 30 Kg S ha-1 had the highest seed and stover yields. Also the oil and the protein content were found maximum in the treatment applied 30 Kg S ha-1 but comparable with 20 Kg S ha-1.
DOI: 10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1j.11310
Pages: 709-712 | 433 Views 141 Downloads
download (4901KB)
How to cite this article:
PB Gunjal, AB Mohite, JB Patil, VB Gedam. Effect of land configuration methods and sulphur levels on yield attributes, quality and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Int J Chem Stud 2021;9(1):709-712. DOI: 10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1j.11310
